yawner.diaryland.com

o l d-----n e w-----l a s t-----n e x t-----m e-----y o u-----m a i l-----n o t e s-----r i n g s-----

the mystery of the relatively polite porn, part II

02/12/01 @ 11:02 p.m.

Sorry to take this into a second entry, but I’m still having problems understanding what the fuck is going on. Yesterday I got two more hits for “clothed+nipples” and “nipples+no+nudity”, which, added to “clothed boobs”, “no nude cleavage”, “fully clothed nipples” and “boobs+covered”, brings the total to six this week. This coincides with the worst bout of insomnia I’ve ever had, which means I just can’t seem to get this out of my head. It’s time to launch an investigation...
I’ve decided it can’t be a bunch of different people, because the odds of five separate people looking for the same kind of non-porn in the space of four or five days is just too remote. This is, without doubt, a specialist market that wouldn’t be interesting to other porn searchers, because most people understand that nudity is crucial in the world of pornography. This is almost certainly the work of a lone pornographer.
There have been a number of conspiracy theories which deserve examination, regarding the possibility that it’s just friends doing it to drive me slightly mad. This theory, and others which are simply variations on the theme, have little credibility. If the last two came from friends who read the last entry, the first four remain unexplained. It seems unlikely that they could guess that such bizarre searches would lead to my diary in the first place, so we can, therefore, rule out the possibility of a second searcher.
What makes this investigation so confusing is that if it’s the same guy, why does he keep coming here to the same entry? As the Zapruder Stats Counter (on loan from Time Life Inc.) shows, he comes back, and to the entry. Back, and to the entry. Back, and to the entry. Back, and to the entry. When is he gonna work out that no one’s nipples make any kind of appearance here, neither fully clothed, nor covered?
And when is he gonna realise that unless you’re naked, everyone’s nipples are covered and fully clothed? When is he gonna realise he’s got two of his own? Why does he need to look for specialist sites for people who are fully dressed? How can he see nipples if they’re covered anyway? And why can’t he sign my guestbook to explain and put me out of my misery?
With little evidence to hand, with so many witnesses having “accidental” deaths since my inquiry opened, and with the years of conspiracy theories and folklore robbing it of any credibility, this case is impossible to solve.
Unless he signs my guestbook, the big freak of a wanker!

b o o k m a r k s-----r u d i e s-----u p d a t e s-----m y--i l l n e s s -----m o v i e--r e v i e w s

Content and layout © Yawner, 2001. Hosted by Diaryland. Best viewed with IE5, probably pants with Netscape.


o l d-----n e w-----l a s t-----n e x t-----m e-----y o u-----m a i l-----n o t e s-----r i n g s-----







the mystery of the relatively polite porn, part II
02/12/01 @ 11:02 p.m.
Sorry to take this into a second entry, but I’m still having problems understanding what the fuck is going on. Yesterday I got two more hits for “clothed+nipples” and “nipples+no+nudity”, which, added to “clothed boobs”, “no nude cleavage”, “fully clothed nipples” and “boobs+covered”, brings the total to six this week. This coincides with the worst bout of insomnia I’ve ever had, which means I just can’t seem to get this out of my head. It’s time to launch an investigation... I’ve decided it can’t be a bunch of different people, because the odds of five separate people looking for the same kind of non-porn in the space of four or five days is just too remote. This is, without doubt, a specialist market that wouldn’t be interesting to other porn searchers, because most people understand that nudity is crucial in the world of pornography. This is almost certainly the work of a lone pornographer. There have been a number of conspiracy theories which deserve examination, regarding the possibility that it’s just friends doing it to drive me slightly mad. This theory, and others which are simply variations on the theme, have little credibility. If the last two came from friends who read the last entry, the first four remain unexplained. It seems unlikely that they could guess that such bizarre searches would lead to my diary in the first place, so we can, therefore, rule out the possibility of a second searcher. What makes this investigation so confusing is that if it’s the same guy, why does he keep coming here to the same entry? As the Zapruder Stats Counter (on loan from Time Life Inc.) shows, he comes back, and to the entry. Back, and to the entry. Back, and to the entry. Back, and to the entry. When is he gonna work out that no one’s nipples make any kind of appearance here, neither fully clothed, nor covered? And when is he gonna realise that unless you’re naked, everyone’s nipples are covered and fully clothed? When is he gonna realise he’s got two of his own? Why does he need to look for specialist sites for people who are fully dressed? How can he see nipples if they’re covered anyway? And why can’t he sign my guestbook to explain and put me out of my misery? With little evidence to hand, with so many witnesses having “accidental” deaths since my inquiry opened, and with the years of conspiracy theories and folklore robbing it of any credibility, this case is impossible to solve. Unless he signs my guestbook, the big freak of a wanker!
	b o o k m a r k s-----r u d i e s-----u p d a t e s-----m y--i l l n e s s -----m o v i e--r e v i e w s







	Content and layout © Yawner, 2001. Hosted by Diaryland. Best viewed with IE5, probably pants with Netscape.